跳到主要导航
跳到搜索
跳到主要内容
Pure University (For Demo Only) 国内
帮助和常见问题
English
中文
国内
简介
研究单位
科研成果
设备
数据集
活动
奖项
影响
项目
新闻 / 媒体
按专业知识、名称或附属进行搜索
Precautionary Principle (PP) versus As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP): Which one to use and when
Howard Pike, Faisal Khan,
Paul Amyotte
Energy
科研成果
:
期刊稿件
›
文章
›
同行评审
22
引用 (Scopus)
综述
指纹
指纹
探究 'Precautionary Principle (PP) versus As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP): Which one to use and when' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。
分类
加权
按字母排序
Keyphrases
Industrial Development
100%
Precautionary Principle
100%
ALARA
100%
Development Activities
66%
High Risk
33%
Linear Relationship
33%
Employers
33%
Environmental Risk
33%
Public Policy
33%
Likelihood of Occurrence
33%
Public Awareness
33%
Public Perception
33%
Harsh Environment
33%
Nonlinear Relationship
33%
Illustrative Examples
33%
Safety Risk
33%
Sound Science
33%
Untrusted
33%
Pipeline Transportation
33%
Offshore Development
33%
Petrochemical Plant
33%
Petroleum Refinery
33%
Petrochemical Refinery
33%
Public Perception of Risk
33%
Effective Communication
33%
Social Sciences
Industrial Development
100%
Precautionary Principle
100%
Policy Making
33%
Decision Making
33%
Transport
33%
Government Policy
33%
Technological Change
33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Industrial Development
100%
Precautionary Principle
100%
Decision Making
33%
Environmental Risk
33%
Heavy Oil
33%
Policy Making
33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Environmental Precaution
100%