跳到主要导航
跳到搜索
跳到主要内容
Pure University (For Demo Only) 国内
帮助和常见问题
English
中文
国内
简介
研究单位
科研成果
设备
数据集
活动
奖项
影响
项目
新闻 / 媒体
按专业知识、名称或附属进行搜索
A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people
Kenneth Rockwood
,
Melissa Andrew
,
Arnold Mitnitski
Office of Academic Affairs
Health Professions
Institutional Research Division
科研成果
:
期刊稿件
›
文章
›
同行评审
1001
引用 (Scopus)
综述
指纹
指纹
探究 'A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。
分类
加权
按字母排序
Keyphrases
Elderly People
100%
Frailty
100%
Frailty Index
100%
Index Score
28%
Pre-frail
28%
All-cause Mortality
14%
Clinical Translation
14%
Outcome-based
14%
One-based
14%
Aging
14%
Clinical Examination
14%
Convergent Validity
14%
Adverse Outcomes
14%
Deficit Accumulation
14%
Cumulative Index
14%
Criterion Validity
14%
5-year Survival
14%
Risk Level
14%
Canadian Studies
14%
Index Distribution
14%
70 Years Old
14%
Health Status Measures
14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
All Cause Mortality
100%
Health Status
100%
Mathematics
Median
100%
Test Criterion
100%
Nursing and Health Professions
Frailty
100%
Institutionalization
16%
All Cause Mortality
8%
Health Status
8%
Adverse Outcome
8%
Criterion Related Validity
8%
Clinical Examination
8%
Convergent Validity
8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
Frailty
100%
All Cause Mortality
8%
Health Status
8%
Adverse Outcome
8%