Smith-Petersen Versus Watson-Jones Approach Does Not Affect Quality of Open Reduction of Femoral Neck Fracture

Joseph T. Patterson, Keisuke Ishii, Paul Tornetta, Ross K. Leighton, Darin M. Friess, Clifford B. Jones, Ari Levine, Jeffrey J. Maclean, Theodore Miclau, Brian H. Mullis, William T. Obremskey, Robert F. Ostrum, J. Spence Reid, John A. Ruder, Anas Saleh, Andrew H. Schmidt, David C. Teague, Antonios Tsismenakis, Jerald R. Westberg, Saam Morshed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-522
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume35
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2021
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Keywords

  • Smith-Petersen
  • Watson-Jones
  • adult
  • anterior approach
  • anterolateral approach
  • approach
  • displaced
  • femoral neck
  • fracture
  • quality of reduction
  • reduction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Smith-Petersen Versus Watson-Jones Approach Does Not Affect Quality of Open Reduction of Femoral Neck Fracture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this