Serious reporting deficiencies exist in minimal important difference studies: current state and suggestions for improvement

Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Tahira Devji, Anila Qasim, Mark Phillips, Bradley C. Johnston, Niveditha Devasenapathy, Dena Zeraatkar, Meha Bhatt, Xuejing Jin, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Olivia Urquhart, Farid Foroutan, Stefan Schandelmaier, Hector Pardo-Hernandez, Robin WM Vernooij, Hsiaomin Huang, Yamna Rizwan, Reed Siemieniuk, Lyubov Lytvyn, Donald L. PatrickShanil Ebrahim, Toshi A. Furukawa, Gihad Nesrallah, Holger J. Schunemann, Mohit Bhandari, Lehana Thabane, Gordon H. Guyatt

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-32
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume150
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Epidemiology

Keywords

  • Anchor-based methods
  • Credibility
  • Minimal important difference
  • Patient-reported outcome
  • Reporting quality
  • Systematic survey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Serious reporting deficiencies exist in minimal important difference studies: current state and suggestions for improvement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this